A horse race is a competition where horses are harnessed and ridden by jockeys over a set distance. The first two finishers receive a prize, usually a sum of money. Some horse races are run over a short distance, known as a sprint, while others are long-distance races called routes or staying races. There are various rules that govern how a horse race is conducted, with different national organizations having their own rulebooks. The rules vary slightly, but in general all races must have a specified start time and finish time, be run under veterinary supervision, and require that each rider must follow the course.
When journalists cover elections by focusing primarily on who is in the lead and who is behind — what’s known as horse race coverage, or election coverage that frames candidates and voters in terms of competitive game-play — voters, candidates and the news industry itself suffer, according to research. This collection of updated research explores the issue and looks at some potential solutions.
Despite the glamour of Thoroughbred racing, the sport is plagued by injuries and drug abuse. In addition, the animals are forced to sprint at speeds so great that they frequently break bones and hemorrhage from their lungs. In some cases, these horrific injuries are so severe that a horse must be put down. In addition, the unnatural training of a racehorse inhibits its natural instincts and leads to mental and emotional distress, which is often displayed in repetitive behaviors such as biting, cribbing, pacing and self-harm.
With mudslinging, name calling and attack ads, the real issues at stake in this year’s presidential horse race easily get lost in the noise. But if the country is to move forward, it’s vital that we address these core challenges in a way that reflects the American people’s values and priorities.
The board of a company that decides to hold an overt leadership contest for its next CEO should first consider whether the organization’s culture and organizational structure are compatible with such a contest. Alternatively, an overt leadership contest can have a negative impact on the company’s ability to retain high performers who were vying for the role and may have aligned themselves with an unsuccessful candidate.
The board should also decide whether the best option is to have several strong internal candidates able to compete for the position. This can serve as a source of motivation for the organization’s top talent and help ensure that the right executive is chosen to lead the company. Moreover, it can demonstrate that the board has invested in the development of its leadership pool and is committed to helping high performers advance to senior management roles. Ideally, the board will also take steps to minimize any potential disruptions to the company’s business and operations if the decision is to conduct an overt leadership contest.